<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1555 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281766</link>
    <description>The court granted the petitioner an opportunity to file a petition under Section 84 of the TNVAT Act within one week and directed the respondent to consider it, pass an order on merits, and provide a personal hearing within two weeks. No coercive action was to be taken against the petitioner until the new order was issued. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2019 07:00:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1555 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281766</link>
      <description>The court granted the petitioner an opportunity to file a petition under Section 84 of the TNVAT Act within one week and directed the respondent to consider it, pass an order on merits, and provide a personal hearing within two weeks. No coercive action was to be taken against the petitioner until the new order was issued. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>