<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 4 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18816</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the firm, allowing the investment allowance under section 32A for machinery used in coal production activities. The court determined that the firm&#039;s activities, including cutting, drilling, and blasting stones, constituted coal production processes, qualifying for the investment allowance. Justice Bhagabati Prasad Banerjee concurred with the decision, ultimately upholding the allowance of investment for the firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:04:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 4 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18816</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the firm, allowing the investment allowance under section 32A for machinery used in coal production activities. The court determined that the firm&#039;s activities, including cutting, drilling, and blasting stones, constituted coal production processes, qualifying for the investment allowance. Justice Bhagabati Prasad Banerjee concurred with the decision, ultimately upholding the allowance of investment for the firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>