<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 14 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18795</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the tax case petitions, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the assessee, a partner in a manufacturing firm, qualifies as an industrial company for tax relief purposes under the Finance Act. The Court found that the assessee met the conditions specified in the Explanation to section 2(7)(c) and that no referable question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s orders. The decision was supported by legal principles established in previous case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:57:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 14 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18795</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the tax case petitions, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the assessee, a partner in a manufacturing firm, qualifies as an industrial company for tax relief purposes under the Finance Act. The Court found that the assessee met the conditions specified in the Explanation to section 2(7)(c) and that no referable question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s orders. The decision was supported by legal principles established in previous case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>