<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (4) TMI 139 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281752</link>
    <description>The court determined that Bagirathi obtained an absolute estate for properties other than the western house under Ranganathan Chettiar&#039;s will, with the western house designated as a life estate for her and a remainder to Chakrapani Chettiar&#039;s son. The plaintiffs were granted possession of the western house. The settlement deed in favor of Sivaprakasa was found valid and operative, while the will executed by Bagirathi in favor of Sivaprakasa was deemed genuine, except for the western house. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the plaintiffs for the western house, with the rest of the properties upheld for Sivaprakasa.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 11:53:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (4) TMI 139 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281752</link>
      <description>The court determined that Bagirathi obtained an absolute estate for properties other than the western house under Ranganathan Chettiar&#039;s will, with the western house designated as a life estate for her and a remainder to Chakrapani Chettiar&#039;s son. The plaintiffs were granted possession of the western house. The settlement deed in favor of Sivaprakasa was found valid and operative, while the will executed by Bagirathi in favor of Sivaprakasa was deemed genuine, except for the western house. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the plaintiffs for the western house, with the rest of the properties upheld for Sivaprakasa.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>