<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 233 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382537</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, directing the petitioner to avail the appeal remedy within four weeks. The court noted the petitioner&#039;s compliance with an earlier order to deposit Rs. 495 Crores and instructed the Appellate Authority to consider this amount during the appeal process. The court maintained the status quo on fixed deposits for two weeks. The petition was dismissed without costs, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 233 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382537</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, directing the petitioner to avail the appeal remedy within four weeks. The court noted the petitioner&#039;s compliance with an earlier order to deposit Rs. 495 Crores and instructed the Appellate Authority to consider this amount during the appeal process. The court maintained the status quo on fixed deposits for two weeks. The petition was dismissed without costs, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>