<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 30 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18777</link>
    <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, allowing exemption under section 54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for short-term capital gains from a property sale. The court interpreted the residency requirements of section 54, emphasizing the continuous intention to reside permanently rather than uninterrupted use, and ruled that the assessee&#039;s seven-month stay fulfilled the criteria. The court disagreed with the interpretation of past continuous tense from a previous judgment and aligned with other High Courts&#039; views. The assessee was deemed entitled to the exemption, and the court ruled against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:18:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 30 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18777</link>
      <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, allowing exemption under section 54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for short-term capital gains from a property sale. The court interpreted the residency requirements of section 54, emphasizing the continuous intention to reside permanently rather than uninterrupted use, and ruled that the assessee&#039;s seven-month stay fulfilled the criteria. The court disagreed with the interpretation of past continuous tense from a previous judgment and aligned with other High Courts&#039; views. The assessee was deemed entitled to the exemption, and the court ruled against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>