<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 229 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382533</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the conditions imposed in the Ext.P6 order for granting stay of assessment orders, citing a CBDT circular allowing for such conditions. The petitioners&#039; challenge against these conditions failed as a previous condition was not complied with. The Court directed the expeditious disposal of appeals within three months while clarifying that compliance with the 10% deposit condition entitles petitioners to stay orders. Failure to comply would result in losing the benefit of stay orders, allowing authorities to proceed with recovery. This decision was deemed exceptional and not to be considered as a precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 229 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382533</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the conditions imposed in the Ext.P6 order for granting stay of assessment orders, citing a CBDT circular allowing for such conditions. The petitioners&#039; challenge against these conditions failed as a previous condition was not complied with. The Court directed the expeditious disposal of appeals within three months while clarifying that compliance with the 10% deposit condition entitles petitioners to stay orders. Failure to comply would result in losing the benefit of stay orders, allowing authorities to proceed with recovery. This decision was deemed exceptional and not to be considered as a precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>