<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 226 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382530</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the AO to sustain only the peak credit of Rs. 2,38,737 regarding cash deposits, uphold the disallowance under Section 54F, verify excess depreciation claimed, and reduce the ad-hoc disallowance to 10%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 06:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 226 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382530</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the AO to sustain only the peak credit of Rs. 2,38,737 regarding cash deposits, uphold the disallowance under Section 54F, verify excess depreciation claimed, and reduce the ad-hoc disallowance to 10%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>