<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 216 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382520</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the Company Petition filed by the Petitioner against the Corporate Debtor for default in payment, triggering the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal found the demand notice, application format, and supporting documents to be valid, classifying the debt as operational and the Petitioner as an operational creditor. Despite objections raised by the Corporate Debtor regarding alternative remedies, the Tribunal emphasized the debt&#039;s existence and default, leading to the declaration of a moratorium and appointment of an interim resolution professional for the insolvency resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 06:20:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 216 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382520</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the Company Petition filed by the Petitioner against the Corporate Debtor for default in payment, triggering the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal found the demand notice, application format, and supporting documents to be valid, classifying the debt as operational and the Petitioner as an operational creditor. Despite objections raised by the Corporate Debtor regarding alternative remedies, the Tribunal emphasized the debt&#039;s existence and default, leading to the declaration of a moratorium and appointment of an interim resolution professional for the insolvency resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>