<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 211 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382515</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax on Real Estate Agent Service and Management Consultant Service used for authorised SEZ operations was treated as admissible where approval of the specified services was obtained after receipt of the services. The Tribunal read Notification No. 12/2013-ST, especially Paragraph 3, as not requiring prior approval before availing the services, and followed the appellant&#039;s earlier case and cited precedent. Subsequent approval by the Development Commissioner was held sufficient to satisfy the notification condition, so refund could not be denied on that procedural ground when the services were otherwise used for authorised operations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 211 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382515</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax on Real Estate Agent Service and Management Consultant Service used for authorised SEZ operations was treated as admissible where approval of the specified services was obtained after receipt of the services. The Tribunal read Notification No. 12/2013-ST, especially Paragraph 3, as not requiring prior approval before availing the services, and followed the appellant&#039;s earlier case and cited precedent. Subsequent approval by the Development Commissioner was held sufficient to satisfy the notification condition, so refund could not be denied on that procedural ground when the services were otherwise used for authorised operations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>