<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 209 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382513</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the original authority&#039;s decision on the service tax demand on goods transport agency services, the levy of interest under Section 75, and the imposition of penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s appeal was rejected due to lack of evidence supporting their claims, resulting in the affirmation of the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 06:12:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 209 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382513</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the original authority&#039;s decision on the service tax demand on goods transport agency services, the levy of interest under Section 75, and the imposition of penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s appeal was rejected due to lack of evidence supporting their claims, resulting in the affirmation of the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>