https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382495 Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure permits rejection only of the plaint as a whole; it cannot be split and rejected only against one defendant if a cause of action or relief survives against others. Where the plaint remains maintainable in part, objections to particular parties or reliefs must be addressed under the appropriate procedural route, not through selective rejection under Rule 11(d). The Court held that rejecting the plaint only qua the bank was impermissible and a jurisdictional error, and it set aside that order. en-us Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jul 2019 06:04:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382495 Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure permits rejection only of the plaint as a whole; it cannot be split and rejected only against one defendant if a cause of action or relief survives against others. Where the plaint remains maintainable in part, objections to particular parties or reliefs must be addressed under the appropriate procedural route, not through selective rejection under Rule 11(d). The Court held that rejecting the plaint only qua the bank was impermissible and a jurisdictional error, and it set aside that order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382495