<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1420 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281748</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to adjust the tax already collected from the principal contractor in respect of the liability on the petitioner to prevent double taxation in the case of sub-contractors. Despite the availability of an appeal process, the court decided to address the matter directly, emphasizing the importance of fairness in tax matters and avoiding unjust taxation practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 20:50:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1420 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281748</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to adjust the tax already collected from the principal contractor in respect of the liability on the petitioner to prevent double taxation in the case of sub-contractors. Despite the availability of an appeal process, the court decided to address the matter directly, emphasizing the importance of fairness in tax matters and avoiding unjust taxation practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>