<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 67 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18769</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the expenditure of Rs. 22,650 on plantations in the factory premises and residential quarters of a public limited company was allowable as a deduction under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court determined that the expenditure was revenue in nature, aimed at environmental preservation, and wholly and exclusively for business purposes, not constituting capital expenditure. The decision overturned the Tribunal&#039;s disallowance and directed the deduction to be allowed, emphasizing the distinction between revenue and capital expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:38:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 67 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18769</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the expenditure of Rs. 22,650 on plantations in the factory premises and residential quarters of a public limited company was allowable as a deduction under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court determined that the expenditure was revenue in nature, aimed at environmental preservation, and wholly and exclusively for business purposes, not constituting capital expenditure. The decision overturned the Tribunal&#039;s disallowance and directed the deduction to be allowed, emphasizing the distinction between revenue and capital expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>