https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18765 Service of a notice under rule 2 of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act was established, and that service triggered rule 16. Once the notice was duly served, the defaulter and any representative-in-interest were restricted from mortgaging, creating any charge on, or otherwise dealing with the attached property without the permission of the Tax Recovery Officer. Rule 16 also barred a civil court from issuing process against such property in execution for payment of money. The objection to interference therefore failed and the revision was dismissed. en-us Thu, 19 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:20:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18765 Service of a notice under rule 2 of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act was established, and that service triggered rule 16. Once the notice was duly served, the defaulter and any representative-in-interest were restricted from mortgaging, creating any charge on, or otherwise dealing with the attached property without the permission of the Tax Recovery Officer. Rule 16 also barred a civil court from issuing process against such property in execution for payment of money. The objection to interference therefore failed and the revision was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 19 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18765