<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1901 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281736</link>
    <description>Section 85(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 authorises a Special Judge to take cognizance without committal, but that regime applied only from 2 October 2016. Because cognizance in the matter had already been taken on 30 July 2016, the Magistrate remained competent to act under the pre-commencement excise law. The jurisdictional challenge therefore fails, and the cognizance order is upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 10:02:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1901 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281736</link>
      <description>Section 85(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 authorises a Special Judge to take cognizance without committal, but that regime applied only from 2 October 2016. Because cognizance in the matter had already been taken on 30 July 2016, the Magistrate remained competent to act under the pre-commencement excise law. The jurisdictional challenge therefore fails, and the cognizance order is upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>