<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1601 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281743</link>
    <description>The petitioner&#039;s challenge against penalty orders for assessment years 2011-2014 was dismissed by the court, which noted that the petitioner had been given multiple opportunities to raise objections over three months. The court advised the petitioner to file an appeal, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 10:02:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1601 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281743</link>
      <description>The petitioner&#039;s challenge against penalty orders for assessment years 2011-2014 was dismissed by the court, which noted that the petitioner had been given multiple opportunities to raise objections over three months. The court advised the petitioner to file an appeal, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>