<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 179 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382483</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the denial of exemption under Section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act for Long Term Capital Gain on the sale of shares was unjustified. The evidence presented by the assessee established the genuineness of the transactions, refuting the allegations based on unrelated scrips. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the exemption and delete the consequential addition, thereby allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 179 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382483</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the denial of exemption under Section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act for Long Term Capital Gain on the sale of shares was unjustified. The evidence presented by the assessee established the genuineness of the transactions, refuting the allegations based on unrelated scrips. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the exemption and delete the consequential addition, thereby allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>