<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382482</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that for the purpose of computing interest under Section 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, the term &quot;month&quot; should be interpreted as a period of 30 days and not a British calendar month. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the interest payable by the assessee based on this interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 19:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382482</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that for the purpose of computing interest under Section 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, the term &quot;month&quot; should be interpreted as a period of 30 days and not a British calendar month. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the interest payable by the assessee based on this interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>