<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 174 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all six appeals of the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions on account of unexplained share capital, pre-operative expenses, unaccounted credit, and commission earned on defense deals. The Tribunal found that the assessee provided extensive documentation proving the genuineness of transactions, and no new evidence was presented by the Revenue to challenge the assessee&#039;s claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2019 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 174 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all six appeals of the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions on account of unexplained share capital, pre-operative expenses, unaccounted credit, and commission earned on defense deals. The Tribunal found that the assessee provided extensive documentation proving the genuineness of transactions, and no new evidence was presented by the Revenue to challenge the assessee&#039;s claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>