<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 171 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382475</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the CIT(A) correctly deleted the addition concerning delayed payment of employees&#039; contribution to the provident fund. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing that payments made before the due date for filing the return are allowable under section 43B, in line with Supreme Court and Bombay High Court judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 09:24:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 171 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382475</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the CIT(A) correctly deleted the addition concerning delayed payment of employees&#039; contribution to the provident fund. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing that payments made before the due date for filing the return are allowable under section 43B, in line with Supreme Court and Bombay High Court judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>