https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382465 Where a reassessment revision under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act raised mixed questions of fact and law concerning works execution, tax deduction, and credit entitlement, writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate because an efficacious statutory appellate remedy was available. The Court treated the availability of that alternative remedy as decisive for declining merits-based writ scrutiny, and the petition was dismissed with liberty to pursue the appellate route. en-us Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jul 2019 09:23:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382465 Where a reassessment revision under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act raised mixed questions of fact and law concerning works execution, tax deduction, and credit entitlement, writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate because an efficacious statutory appellate remedy was available. The Court treated the availability of that alternative remedy as decisive for declining merits-based writ scrutiny, and the petition was dismissed with liberty to pursue the appellate route. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382465