https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382459 The Court addressed the dispute over service tax liability between the petitioner and BSNL, directing both parties to appear before the Superintendent for resolution. The Court declined to interfere with the summons issued by the competent authority, emphasizing the need for a hearing. The Court dismissed the petitioner's claim of premeditated summons, noting the absence of pre-judgment by the authority. Both parties were instructed to attend the Superintendent for resolution, with default leading to a decision based on available records. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly. en-us Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jul 2019 09:23:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382459 The Court addressed the dispute over service tax liability between the petitioner and BSNL, directing both parties to appear before the Superintendent for resolution. The Court declined to interfere with the summons issued by the competent authority, emphasizing the need for a hearing. The Court dismissed the petitioner's claim of premeditated summons, noting the absence of pre-judgment by the authority. Both parties were instructed to attend the Superintendent for resolution, with default leading to a decision based on available records. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382459