https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382446 The Court set aside the Tribunal's decision regarding the recognition of respondent no. 3's degree, emphasizing the invalidity of degrees obtained through correspondence courses from Annamalai University and the lack of post-facto approval by DEC. The judgment directed the treatment of promotions and eligibility based on clarified qualifications and attainment dates, ensuring adherence to mandatory requirements for degree equivalency. The Court ruled that the respondent's degree was not valid at the time of promotion and adjusted promotion dates accordingly, considering subsequent developments and the Supreme Court's precedent in the Annamalai University case. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jul 2019 09:22:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382446 The Court set aside the Tribunal's decision regarding the recognition of respondent no. 3's degree, emphasizing the invalidity of degrees obtained through correspondence courses from Annamalai University and the lack of post-facto approval by DEC. The judgment directed the treatment of promotions and eligibility based on clarified qualifications and attainment dates, ensuring adherence to mandatory requirements for degree equivalency. The Court ruled that the respondent's degree was not valid at the time of promotion and adjusted promotion dates accordingly, considering subsequent developments and the Supreme Court's precedent in the Annamalai University case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382446