https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281717 The Supreme Court set aside the conviction of the original accused under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court found the evidence regarding the demand and acceptance of illegal gratification inadequate and inconsistent. The trap operation and testimonies of prosecution witnesses lacked credibility, and the allegations of false implication by the accused raised doubts. Ultimately, the Court concluded that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to the acquittal of the accused. en-us Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jul 2019 09:59:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281717 The Supreme Court set aside the conviction of the original accused under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court found the evidence regarding the demand and acceptance of illegal gratification inadequate and inconsistent. The trap operation and testimonies of prosecution witnesses lacked credibility, and the allegations of false implication by the accused raised doubts. Ultimately, the Court concluded that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to the acquittal of the accused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281717