https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281716 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, ruling that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. The conviction and sentence under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) were set aside, and the appellant was ordered to be released if not required in any other case. Key issues included the lack of evidence of demand for illegal gratification, discrepancies in witness testimonies, and inconclusive phenolphthalein test results, leading to the unsustainable conviction. en-us Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jul 2019 09:59:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281716 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, ruling that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. The conviction and sentence under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) were set aside, and the appellant was ordered to be released if not required in any other case. Key issues included the lack of evidence of demand for illegal gratification, discrepancies in witness testimonies, and inconclusive phenolphthalein test results, leading to the unsustainable conviction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281716