https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382437 The High Court modified the stay order condition imposed by the 1st respondent from a 40% deposit requirement to 30%, with specific deadlines for the two instalments. The petitioner was permitted to retain the stay order on the condition of meeting the revised deposit terms, warning that failure to comply would result in automatic vacation of the stay without court intervention. The Court emphasized the adjustment was made in the interest of justice, finding the initial condition lacking a special reason. en-us Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jul 2019 08:11:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382437 The High Court modified the stay order condition imposed by the 1st respondent from a 40% deposit requirement to 30%, with specific deadlines for the two instalments. The petitioner was permitted to retain the stay order on the condition of meeting the revised deposit terms, warning that failure to comply would result in automatic vacation of the stay without court intervention. The Court emphasized the adjustment was made in the interest of justice, finding the initial condition lacking a special reason. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382437