<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 115 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382419</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the demand of service tax, interest, and penalties for both branches, with a directive to recompute the demand for the Jamshedpur branch. The appellants&#039; arguments on computational errors and financial hardship were addressed, but the tribunal maintained that penalties were justified due to the deliberate non-payment of collected tax. The appeals were largely dismissed, with specific directions for recalculating the tax and penalties for the Jamshedpur branch.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 115 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382419</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the demand of service tax, interest, and penalties for both branches, with a directive to recompute the demand for the Jamshedpur branch. The appellants&#039; arguments on computational errors and financial hardship were addressed, but the tribunal maintained that penalties were justified due to the deliberate non-payment of collected tax. The appeals were largely dismissed, with specific directions for recalculating the tax and penalties for the Jamshedpur branch.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>