<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 111 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382415</link>
    <description>The Court declared the re-assessment order and demand notice void due to lack of a fair hearing, directing the respondent to set aside the order and notice. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to file objections within two weeks. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to legal requirements and conducting proceedings expediently, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s right to respond to the tax liability proposal fairly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 08:05:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 111 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382415</link>
      <description>The Court declared the re-assessment order and demand notice void due to lack of a fair hearing, directing the respondent to set aside the order and notice. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to file objections within two weeks. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to legal requirements and conducting proceedings expediently, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s right to respond to the tax liability proposal fairly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>