https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382413 The court held that the impugned order was not vitiated by the violation of the 90-day timeframe under Regulation 17(5) of CBLR 2018 or Regulation 20(5) of CBLR 2013. The petitioner was directed to file an appeal with CESTAT, which was requested to expedite the disposal of the appeal within three months from the filing date. The writ petition was disposed of on these terms, with no costs awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. en-us Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jul 2019 07:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382413 The court held that the impugned order was not vitiated by the violation of the 90-day timeframe under Regulation 17(5) of CBLR 2018 or Regulation 20(5) of CBLR 2013. The petitioner was directed to file an appeal with CESTAT, which was requested to expedite the disposal of the appeal within three months from the filing date. The writ petition was disposed of on these terms, with no costs awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382413