<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 107 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382411</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, affirming its jurisdiction to hear the case regarding the legality of Show Cause Notices. The court held that the valuation of relief claimed was appropriate, and the grievance did not fall under mismanagement or oppression, allowing the Civil Court to retain jurisdiction over the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 107 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382411</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, affirming its jurisdiction to hear the case regarding the legality of Show Cause Notices. The court held that the valuation of relief claimed was appropriate, and the grievance did not fall under mismanagement or oppression, allowing the Civil Court to retain jurisdiction over the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>