<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 101 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382405</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals filed by M/s KLMPL and other appellants. The demands based on alleged clandestine removal, denial of Cenvat credit, and confiscation of goods were not sustainable due to the lack of corroborative evidence and procedural lapses in the retrieval and use of electronic data as evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 07:04:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 101 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382405</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals filed by M/s KLMPL and other appellants. The demands based on alleged clandestine removal, denial of Cenvat credit, and confiscation of goods were not sustainable due to the lack of corroborative evidence and procedural lapses in the retrieval and use of electronic data as evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>