https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281706 An appellate court may reappreciate evidence in an appeal against acquittal, but interference is justified only if the trial court's view is perverse or wholly unreasonable, because the presumption of innocence is reinforced by acquittal. Where the trial court adopts a plausible view on the time and place of occurrence and finds the prosecution case weakened by delay, medical evidence, and inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony, that view must ordinarily stand. On the facts described, the evidence was materially inconsistent and the trial court's assessment was a possible view; the acquittal should not have been reversed and the conviction could not be sustained. en-us Mon, 11 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jul 2019 15:27:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281706 An appellate court may reappreciate evidence in an appeal against acquittal, but interference is justified only if the trial court's view is perverse or wholly unreasonable, because the presumption of innocence is reinforced by acquittal. Where the trial court adopts a plausible view on the time and place of occurrence and finds the prosecution case weakened by delay, medical evidence, and inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony, that view must ordinarily stand. On the facts described, the evidence was materially inconsistent and the trial court's assessment was a possible view; the acquittal should not have been reversed and the conviction could not be sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281706