https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281704 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the respondent, a Sub-Inspector of Police, under Section 302 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The court found no errors in the High Court's judgment and emphasized the importance of timely trials. Criticizing the Government's procedural conduct, the respondent was ordered to deposit Rs. 5 lakhs for distribution among the dependents of the deceased officers. The appeal was dismissed. en-us Fri, 20 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jul 2019 15:01:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281704 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the respondent, a Sub-Inspector of Police, under Section 302 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The court found no errors in the High Court's judgment and emphasized the importance of timely trials. Criticizing the Government's procedural conduct, the respondent was ordered to deposit Rs. 5 lakhs for distribution among the dependents of the deceased officers. The appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281704