https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281704 Interference with an acquittal is justified only when the view taken is manifestly perverse or not a possible view on the evidence. On the facts, the prosecution case was found unreliable, while the defence version that the respondent faced armed police officers, was assaulted, and sustained injuries was treated as probable. The Court held that the High Court's conclusion that the respondent had a reasonable apprehension of death or grievous harm, and was entitled to act with a firearm in private defence under Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code, was a possible view on the record. The acquittal was therefore not disturbed. en-us Fri, 20 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jul 2019 15:01:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281704 Interference with an acquittal is justified only when the view taken is manifestly perverse or not a possible view on the evidence. On the facts, the prosecution case was found unreliable, while the defence version that the respondent faced armed police officers, was assaulted, and sustained injuries was treated as probable. The Court held that the High Court's conclusion that the respondent had a reasonable apprehension of death or grievous harm, and was entitled to act with a firearm in private defence under Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code, was a possible view on the record. The acquittal was therefore not disturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281704