<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (8) TMI 129 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281702</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Allahabad High Court&#039;s decision to acquit two accused individuals in a murder case. The High Court found inconsistencies in witness testimony, particularly questioning the reliability of a key witness. The Supreme Court emphasized that interference with a judgment of acquittal is only justified in the presence of glaring infirmities in evidence assessment, which was not the case here. As a result, the appeal challenging the acquittal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 14:56:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (8) TMI 129 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281702</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Allahabad High Court&#039;s decision to acquit two accused individuals in a murder case. The High Court found inconsistencies in witness testimony, particularly questioning the reliability of a key witness. The Supreme Court emphasized that interference with a judgment of acquittal is only justified in the presence of glaring infirmities in evidence assessment, which was not the case here. As a result, the appeal challenging the acquittal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>