https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281699 The Supreme Court upheld the appellants' conviction under Section 376 IPC, affirming the High Court's decision. The sentence was reduced to 5 years rigorous imprisonment with a fine. The appellants were acquitted of charges under Sections 366/34 IPC. The prosecutrix's age was determined to be under 16 years at the time of the incident. The credibility of her testimony was upheld, supported by medical evidence. Despite concerns about the Investigating Officer's conduct, the Court dismissed the appeals, finding no merit in the appellants' arguments. en-us Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jul 2019 14:20:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281699 The Supreme Court upheld the appellants' conviction under Section 376 IPC, affirming the High Court's decision. The sentence was reduced to 5 years rigorous imprisonment with a fine. The appellants were acquitted of charges under Sections 366/34 IPC. The prosecutrix's age was determined to be under 16 years at the time of the incident. The credibility of her testimony was upheld, supported by medical evidence. Despite concerns about the Investigating Officer's conduct, the Court dismissed the appeals, finding no merit in the appellants' arguments. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281699