<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 736 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281699</link>
    <description>A proved birth record and supporting hospital evidence established that the prosecutrix was below 16 years of age on the date of the incident, and the radiological estimate was treated as only approximate and insufficient to displace that record. On the rape charge, the court applied the principle that a credible and reliable prosecutrix may be convicted on her solitary testimony without mandatory corroboration; her evidence was found trustworthy and was supported by medical evidence consistent with intercourse. The concurrent findings below were left undisturbed, and the conviction and sentence for rape were affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 14:20:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 736 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281699</link>
      <description>A proved birth record and supporting hospital evidence established that the prosecutrix was below 16 years of age on the date of the incident, and the radiological estimate was treated as only approximate and insufficient to displace that record. On the rape charge, the court applied the principle that a credible and reliable prosecutrix may be convicted on her solitary testimony without mandatory corroboration; her evidence was found trustworthy and was supported by medical evidence consistent with intercourse. The concurrent findings below were left undisturbed, and the conviction and sentence for rape were affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>