<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 87 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382391</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed some grounds, allowed others, and partly allowed the appeals. The challenge to the validity of the assessment order under section 153C was dismissed due to lack of contestation by the assessee. The addition under section 41(1) for cessation of liability was deleted as it lacked incriminating material and was subject to dispute in the original assessment. The disallowance of interest expenditure under section 40A(2)(b) was also directed to be deleted as it was not based on incriminating material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 87 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382391</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed some grounds, allowed others, and partly allowed the appeals. The challenge to the validity of the assessment order under section 153C was dismissed due to lack of contestation by the assessee. The addition under section 41(1) for cessation of liability was deleted as it lacked incriminating material and was subject to dispute in the original assessment. The disallowance of interest expenditure under section 40A(2)(b) was also directed to be deleted as it was not based on incriminating material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>