<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 77 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382381</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing deduction under Section 80IB(10) for profits from the sale of car parking spaces, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The carry forward of short-term capital loss was also upheld, with the tribunal finding no issue with the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. However, deductions for profits from the sale of residential units with utility rooms exceeding 1500 sq. ft. and flats with built-up areas exceeding 1500 sq. ft. were disallowed. The claim for writing off sundry balances as a deductible expense was denied due to lack of evidence. The appeals for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 had mixed outcomes, with some aspects partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 77 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382381</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing deduction under Section 80IB(10) for profits from the sale of car parking spaces, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The carry forward of short-term capital loss was also upheld, with the tribunal finding no issue with the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. However, deductions for profits from the sale of residential units with utility rooms exceeding 1500 sq. ft. and flats with built-up areas exceeding 1500 sq. ft. were disallowed. The claim for writing off sundry balances as a deductible expense was denied due to lack of evidence. The appeals for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 had mixed outcomes, with some aspects partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>