<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 74 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382378</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the revision order passed by the PCIT. It held that the assessee&#039;s method of accounting for foreign exchange differences was consistent and accepted, and such differences should be treated as revenue items rather than part of the closing stock cost. The Tribunal found no basis for the revision order and ruled in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 74 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382378</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the revision order passed by the PCIT. It held that the assessee&#039;s method of accounting for foreign exchange differences was consistent and accepted, and such differences should be treated as revenue items rather than part of the closing stock cost. The Tribunal found no basis for the revision order and ruled in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>