<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 69 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382373</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for multiple assessment years, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act and related disallowance of interest expenses. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of incriminating material, procedural lapses by the Assessing Officer, and the adequacy of documentary evidence presented by the assessee to establish the genuineness and creditworthiness of the transactions involving unsecured loans.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 69 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382373</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for multiple assessment years, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act and related disallowance of interest expenses. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of incriminating material, procedural lapses by the Assessing Officer, and the adequacy of documentary evidence presented by the assessee to establish the genuineness and creditworthiness of the transactions involving unsecured loans.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>