<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Applicant Fails to Prove Respondent No.2&#039;s Intent to Join Arbitration Agreement; Sole Arbitrator Appointment Denied.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47645</link>
    <description>Appointment of a sole arbitrator - The burden is on the applicant to establish that respondent No.2 had an intention to consent to the arbitration agreement and be party thereto, maybe for the limited purpose - That burden has not been discharged by the applicant at all.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 07:26:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 07:26:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Applicant Fails to Prove Respondent No.2&#039;s Intent to Join Arbitration Agreement; Sole Arbitrator Appointment Denied.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47645</link>
      <description>Appointment of a sole arbitrator - The burden is on the applicant to establish that respondent No.2 had an intention to consent to the arbitration agreement and be party thereto, maybe for the limited purpose - That burden has not been discharged by the applicant at all.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 07:26:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>