<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 65 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382369</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application against respondent No.2, stating it cannot be subjected to the proposed arbitration proceedings. Mr. Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed was appointed as the sole arbitrator to conduct domestic commercial arbitration between the applicant and respondent No.1 in New Delhi. The application was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 07:26:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 65 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382369</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application against respondent No.2, stating it cannot be subjected to the proposed arbitration proceedings. Mr. Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed was appointed as the sole arbitrator to conduct domestic commercial arbitration between the applicant and respondent No.1 in New Delhi. The application was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>