<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 62 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382366</link>
    <description>The Court held that interest on delayed refund under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 becomes payable from three months after the refund application date. Citing precedent cases, the Court rejected the respondents&#039; argument that interest is only payable from the refund order date. The Court granted the petitioners&#039; request for interest on the refund amount from 11th January 2008 to 4th December 2016, issuing a writ of mandamus for the payment of interest within two months. The Court also dismissed the respondents&#039; contention regarding the nature of the petitioners&#039; deposits, affirming the petitioners&#039; entitlement to the refund with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 62 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382366</link>
      <description>The Court held that interest on delayed refund under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 becomes payable from three months after the refund application date. Citing precedent cases, the Court rejected the respondents&#039; argument that interest is only payable from the refund order date. The Court granted the petitioners&#039; request for interest on the refund amount from 11th January 2008 to 4th December 2016, issuing a writ of mandamus for the payment of interest within two months. The Court also dismissed the respondents&#039; contention regarding the nature of the petitioners&#039; deposits, affirming the petitioners&#039; entitlement to the refund with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>