<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 57 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382361</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition challenging the rejection of the application for settlement under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The retrospective amendment to Section 90(2) of the Finance Act, 1998, rendered the constitutional challenge moot. The court directed the issuance of a final certificate under the Scheme and quashed the recovery notices, as the petitioners complied with the revised payment timeline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 57 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382361</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition challenging the rejection of the application for settlement under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The retrospective amendment to Section 90(2) of the Finance Act, 1998, rendered the constitutional challenge moot. The court directed the issuance of a final certificate under the Scheme and quashed the recovery notices, as the petitioners complied with the revised payment timeline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>