<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 53 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382357</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision, ruling that the appellants are liable to pay duty on waste and scrap of capital goods for which Cenvat credit was availed, rejecting the argument of the demand being time-barred. The Tribunal emphasized the obligation post the insertion of Rule 3(5A) and distinguished the current case from a previous judgment cited by the appellants, ultimately dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 06:15:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 53 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382357</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision, ruling that the appellants are liable to pay duty on waste and scrap of capital goods for which Cenvat credit was availed, rejecting the argument of the demand being time-barred. The Tribunal emphasized the obligation post the insertion of Rule 3(5A) and distinguished the current case from a previous judgment cited by the appellants, ultimately dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>