<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 49 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382353</link>
    <description>The court, after analyzing the interpretation of the TNVAT Act and CST Act, found the revised assessment order issued by the respondent invalid due to discrepancies in considering seller details. Emphasizing the importance of applying legal principles, the court set aside the assessment order and directed a reevaluation, instructing the respondent to consider all seller details provided by the petitioner to ensure procedural fairness and accuracy in the assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 06:14:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 49 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382353</link>
      <description>The court, after analyzing the interpretation of the TNVAT Act and CST Act, found the revised assessment order issued by the respondent invalid due to discrepancies in considering seller details. Emphasizing the importance of applying legal principles, the court set aside the assessment order and directed a reevaluation, instructing the respondent to consider all seller details provided by the petitioner to ensure procedural fairness and accuracy in the assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>