<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 48 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382352</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the judgment on conviction and sentence, dismissing the appeal and allowing the petitioner&#039;s plea. The complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was deemed unsustainable due to the lack of proper notice service, leading to the dismissal of the complaint. The court emphasized the importance of correctly addressing statutory notices to establish a valid cause of action in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 06:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 48 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382352</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the judgment on conviction and sentence, dismissing the appeal and allowing the petitioner&#039;s plea. The complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was deemed unsustainable due to the lack of proper notice service, leading to the dismissal of the complaint. The court emphasized the importance of correctly addressing statutory notices to establish a valid cause of action in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>