<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1629 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281688</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order quashing reassessment proceedings and deleting additions made by the AO. The Tribunal emphasized the AO&#039;s duty to independently verify information and address objections raised by the assessee, as per the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 20:32:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1629 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281688</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order quashing reassessment proceedings and deleting additions made by the AO. The Tribunal emphasized the AO&#039;s duty to independently verify information and address objections raised by the assessee, as per the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>