<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1825 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281693</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed tax appeals challenging a CESTAT judgment, citing Section 35G of the Central Excise Act. The court held that issues concerning duty rates or goods value should be appealed to the Supreme Court, not the High Court. This decision was based on a previous case precedent where similar appeals were dismissed by the High Court. The tax appeals were deemed not maintainable before the High Court, aligning with the statutory provisions of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 20:32:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1825 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281693</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed tax appeals challenging a CESTAT judgment, citing Section 35G of the Central Excise Act. The court held that issues concerning duty rates or goods value should be appealed to the Supreme Court, not the High Court. This decision was based on a previous case precedent where similar appeals were dismissed by the High Court. The tax appeals were deemed not maintainable before the High Court, aligning with the statutory provisions of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>