<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1523 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed that the transactions constituted a business activity rather than investment, directing adjustments in the computation of business income. The assessee was permitted to claim the benefit of Security Transaction Tax related to business income and to adjust D-mat charges against the cost of shares confirmed as capital assets. The appeal was partially allowed, with business income limited to shares not carried over as capital assets as of a specific date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 15:56:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1523 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed that the transactions constituted a business activity rather than investment, directing adjustments in the computation of business income. The assessee was permitted to claim the benefit of Security Transaction Tax related to business income and to adjust D-mat charges against the cost of shares confirmed as capital assets. The appeal was partially allowed, with business income limited to shares not carried over as capital assets as of a specific date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>